Nefret Su\u00e7lar\u0131 Konferans\u0131’nda konu\u015fan Prof. Sancar, 24 Nisan’\u0131n y\u00fczle\u015fme i\u00e7in bir f\u0131rsat oldu\u011funu s\u00f6yledi; hukuk\u00e7u \u00c7etin, Hrant Dink’i “T\u00fcrkl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc a\u015fa\u011f\u0131lamak”tan cezaland\u0131ran yarg\u0131 karar\u0131ndaki “nefreti” payla\u015ft\u0131; Karan, nefret su\u00e7lar\u0131yla yasal ve g\u00fcnl\u00fck m\u00fccadelenin yetersizli\u011fine i\u015faret etti. Prof. Dr. Mithat Sancar, Uluslararas\u0131 Nefret Su\u00e7lar\u0131 Konferans\u0131’nda Ermeni ayd\u0131nlar\u0131n \u0130stanbul’dan s\u00fcr\u00fclmelerinin y\u0131ld\u00f6n\u00fcm\u00fc olan 24 Nisan’da yetkililerin y\u00fczle\u015fme anlam\u0131nda atacaklar\u0131n ad\u0131mlar\u0131n “onar\u0131c\u0131 adaletin etkisini art\u0131rmaya” \u00f6nemli katk\u0131 yapaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6yledi. Sosyal De\u011fi\u015fim Derne\u011fi ve Irk\u00e7\u0131l\u0131\u011fa ve Milliyet\u00e7ili\u011fe DurDe \u0130nisiyatifi’nin d\u00fczenledi\u011fi ve L\u00fctfi K\u0131rdar Kongre Merkezi’nde ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen konferansta konu\u015fan Sancar, 1915’teki Ermeni katliam\u0131n\u0131n ard\u0131ndan ya\u015fananlar a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan “nefret s\u00f6yleminin en canl\u0131 kayna\u011f\u0131” oldu\u011funu a\u00e7\u0131klad\u0131. “Bize bir yasa laz\u0131m: Nefret Su\u00e7lar\u0131yla M\u00fccadelede Yasal D\u00fczenlemeler” ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131, Bilgi \u00dcniversitesi’nden Prof. Dr. Turgut Tarhanl\u0131’n\u0131n kolayla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 oturumda s\u00f6z alan hukuk\u00e7ular Fethiye \u00c7etin ve Ula\u015f Karan ve ile Prof. Dr. Mithat Sancar, bir an \u00f6nce bir Nefret Su\u00e7lar\u0131 Yasas\u0131’n\u0131n y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe sokulmas\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6nemine i\u015faret eden konu\u015fmalar yapt\u0131lar. \u00c7etin: Cinayetler k\u0131\u015fk\u0131rtmalarla haz\u0131rland\u0131 Sunumuna “Nefret s\u00f6ylemi \u00f6d\u00fcr\u00fcr m\u00fc?” diye sorarak ba\u015flayan Hrant Dink davas\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fcdahil\u0131 avukat\u0131 \u00c7etin, \u00f6ld\u00fcr\u00fclmeden \u00f6nce Dink’i “T\u00fcrkl\u00fc\u011fe hakaret”ten mahkum eden karar\u0131n gerek\u00e7e metninin nefret s\u00f6ylemiyle dolu oldu\u011funu s\u00f6yledi; cinayet s\u00fcrecine de medyan\u0131n ve yarg\u0131n\u0131n haks\u0131z su\u00e7lamalar\u0131yla girildi\u011fini kaydetti. \u00c7etin, Hrant Dink, Rahip Santoro, Ahmet Kaya ve Malatya Zirve Yay\u0131nevi’ndeki cinayetlerinin k\u0131\u015fk\u0131rtmayla ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirildi\u011fini hat\u0131rlatt\u0131; “Medya nefretin yay\u0131lmas\u0131nda \u00f6nemli rol oynad\u0131” dedi. Karan: 216 ile i\u00e7 tehdit g\u00f6r\u00fclenler yarg\u0131lan\u0131yor Karan, “D\u00fcnyan\u0131n hi\u00e7bir yerinde hukuk kararlar\u0131nda do\u011frulu\u011fu kesin olmayan tespitler yer almazken T\u00fcrkiye’de Yarg\u0131tay kararlar\u0131nda, “Travestiler hastal\u0131k sa\u00e7arlar”, “\u0130slam en son ve akla en uygun dindir” gibi c\u00fcmleler yer al\u0131yor. Y\u00fcksek yarg\u0131da g\u00f6revli hakimler, ald\u0131klar\u0131 \u0131rk\u00e7\u0131, ayr\u0131mc\u0131 kararlarla y\u00fckselirler.” gibi tespitlerde bulundu. 216. maddenin adeta devletin kendini i\u00e7 tehditlerden koruma maddesi olarak uyguland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6yleyen Karan, “Devlet hangi grubu kendine tehdit olarak g\u00f6r\u00fcyorsa, 216. maddeyi kullanarak bu insanlar\u0131 yarg\u0131l\u0131yor. 70’lerde solcular\u0131, 80’lerde K\u00fcrtleri, 90’larda K\u00fcrtlerle birlikte \u0130slamc\u0131lar\u0131 bu maddeden yarg\u0131layarak cezaland\u0131rd\u0131” diyerek konu\u015fmas\u0131n\u0131 sonland\u0131rd\u0131. Sancar: Hukukta kar\u0131\u015f\u0131kl\u0131klar var Sancar, siyasetin nefret s\u00f6ylemini hem normalle\u015ftirdi\u011fini hem de daha fazla yayg\u0131nla\u015fmas\u0131na yard\u0131mc\u0131 oldu\u011funu s\u00f6yledi. Hukukta d\u00fczenlemeler ve \u00e7e\u015fitli h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin oldu\u011funu s\u00f6yleyen Sancar, bu d\u00fczenlemelerin nefretin beslenmesine de yol a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in hukukta kar\u0131\u015f\u0131kl\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131n oldu\u011funu s\u00f6yledi. Sancar ayr\u0131ca, “Milliyet\u00e7i ideoloji topluma benimsetilmi\u015ftir bu da g\u00fcnl\u00fck hayatta nefret s\u00f6yleminin yayg\u0131n olmas\u0131na yol a\u00e7\u0131yor. 1915’te olan T\u00fcrkiye’de nefret s\u00f6yleminin ba\u015flang\u0131c\u0131d\u0131r. \u015eiddet ile ilgili b\u00fct\u00fcn s\u00f6ylemlerin nedeni 1915’teki olaylard\u0131r. Nefret s\u00f6ylemi ve nefret su\u00e7lar\u0131yla ilgili yasa \u00e7\u0131kmas\u0131 k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fcmsenecek bir \u015fey de\u011fil. Bu yasa tam da T\u00fcrkiye gibi nefretin yayg\u0131n oldu\u011fu \u00fclkelerde \u00e7\u0131kmal\u0131.” tespitinde bulundu. Erol \u00d6NDERO\u011eLU-hukuk@bianet.org \u0130stanbul – B\u0130A Haber Merkezi 17 Nisan 2011, Pazar http:\/\/bianet.org\/bianet\/toplum\/129320-sancar-24-nisan-nefret-soylemiyle-mucadelede-bir-firsat<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Nefret Su\u00e7lar\u0131 Konferans\u0131’nda konu\u015fan Prof. Sancar, 24 Nisan’\u0131n y\u00fczle\u015fme i\u00e7in bir f\u0131rsat oldu\u011funu s\u00f6yledi; hukuk\u00e7u \u00c7etin, Hrant Dink’i “T\u00fcrkl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc a\u015fa\u011f\u0131lamak”tan cezaland\u0131ran yarg\u0131 karar\u0131ndaki “nefreti” payla\u015ft\u0131; Karan, nefret su\u00e7lar\u0131yla yasal ve g\u00fcnl\u00fck m\u00fccadelenin yetersizli\u011fine i\u015faret etti. Prof. Dr. Mithat Sancar, Uluslararas\u0131 Nefret Su\u00e7lar\u0131 Konferans\u0131’nda Ermeni ayd\u0131nlar\u0131n \u0130stanbul’dan s\u00fcr\u00fclmelerinin y\u0131ld\u00f6n\u00fcm\u00fc olan 24 Nisan’da yetkililerin y\u00fczle\u015fme anlam\u0131nda atacaklar\u0131n […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[14],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5239","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-haberler"],"yoast_head":"\n