![\"Dink](\"http:\/\/akunq.net\/tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/05\/Dink-cinayeti-300x218.jpg\")
<\/a>Yarg\u0131tay 9. Ceza Dairesi\u2019nin Dink cinayeti davas\u0131yla ilgili verdi\u011fi karar\u0131n ayr\u0131nt\u0131lar\u0131 ortaya \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131k\u00e7a, Hrant Dink\u2019i \u00f6l\u00fcme g\u00f6t\u00fcren senaryo da yerli yerine oturuyor. Avukat Fethiye \u00c7etin, karardaki ifadelerin cinayeti planlayan iradenin kurgulad\u0131\u011f\u0131 senaryo ile uyumuna dikkat \u00e7ekiyor: \u201c\u00d6ncesi ve sonras\u0131yla bir b\u00fct\u00fcn olan cinayet s\u00fcreci, bu kararla g\u00f6rmezden gelindi, hakikatin ortaya \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmas\u0131 engellendi.\u201d.<\/span><\/i><\/b><\/p>\nYarg\u0131tay 9. Dairesi\u2019nin Dink cinayetiyle ilgili verdi\u011fi karar\u0131n ayr\u0131nt\u0131lar\u0131 hukuk ad\u0131na kabul edilemez ayr\u0131nt\u0131larla dolu. Dink ailesinin avukatlar\u0131ndan Fethiye \u00c7etin, karar metninde yer alan baz\u0131 ifadelere dikkat \u00e7ekerek Yarg\u0131tay\u2019\u0131n tutumunu ele\u015ftirdi. Avukat \u00c7etin, Agos\u2019a yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klamada, \u201cBu kararla 9. Ceza Dairesi, ter\u00f6r ve ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc kavramlar\u0131n\u0131 hukuk normlar\u0131na ve yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131 bi\u00e7imde yorumlam\u0131\u015f oldu\u201d dedi.<\/span><\/p>\n Avukat Fethiye \u00c7etin, \u201cYarg\u0131tay dairesi, \u2018su\u00e7 i\u015flemek amac\u0131yla bir \u00f6rg\u00fct kuruldu\u011funu\u2019 kabul etti ancak bu \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar verdi. Bu tespit her \u015feyden \u00f6nce, yasadaki \u2018ter\u00f6r\u2019 tan\u0131m\u0131na ayk\u0131r\u0131\u201d dedi.<\/span><\/p>\n Ter\u00f6r tan\u0131m\u0131 3713 Say\u0131l\u0131 Ter\u00f6rle M\u00fccadele Kanunu\u2019nun 1. maddesinde \u015f\u00f6yle yap\u0131l\u0131yor:<\/span><\/p>\n \u201cCebir ve \u015fiddet kullanarak; bask\u0131, korkutma, y\u0131ld\u0131rma, sindirme veya tehdit y\u00f6ntemleri ile Anayasada belirtilen Cumhuriyetin niteliklerini, siyasi, hukuki, sosyal, laik, ekonomik d\u00fczeni de\u011fi\u015ftirmek, Devletin \u00fclkesi ve milletiyle b\u00f6l\u00fcnmez b\u00fct\u00fcnl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc bozmak, T\u00fcrk Devletinin ve Cumhuriyetin varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 tehlikeye d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcrmek, Devlet otoritesini zaafa u\u011fratmak veya y\u0131kmak veya ele ge\u00e7irmek, temel hak ve h\u00fcrriyetleri yok etmek, Devletin i\u00e7 ve d\u0131\u015f g\u00fcvenli\u011fini, kamu d\u00fczenini veya genel sa\u011fl\u0131\u011f\u0131 bozmay\u0131 ve an\u0131lan Kanunun 7. maddesi ile 765 say\u0131l\u0131 TCK\u2019n\u0131n 168 ve 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCK\u2019n\u0131n 314. maddelerinde g\u00f6sterilen su\u00e7lar\u0131 i\u015flemek \u00fczere bu maddeler uyar\u0131nca kurulan \u00f6rg\u00fctler ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fctleridir.\u201d\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n Avukat \u00c7etin, \u201cYasada yap\u0131lan bu tan\u0131ma g\u00f6re, anayasada belirtilen; \u2018Anayasada belirtilen ilkeleri, temel hak ve \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fckleri ve kamu d\u00fczenini yok etmek ibarelerini yok saym\u0131\u015f, yasa ile korunan menfaati tamamen yanl\u0131\u015f de\u011ferlendirmi\u015ftir\u201d dedi.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n Cezaland\u0131rma ama\u00e7l\u0131 \u00f6rg\u00fct<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n Fethiye \u00c7etin\u2019e g\u00f6re bu de\u011ferlendirme yasan\u0131n yanl\u0131\u015f yorumundan de\u011fil bilin\u00e7li bir tercihten kaynaklan\u0131yor. Buna g\u00f6re milliyet\u00e7i duygulara sahip baz\u0131 gen\u00e7ler taraf\u0131ndan i\u015flenen bu s\u0131radan cinayetin arkas\u0131nda ba\u015fka bir g\u00fc\u00e7 yok. B\u00f6ylece, bu san\u0131klar\u0131 izleyen ve cinayet planlar\u0131n\u0131n b\u00fct\u00fcn ayr\u0131nt\u0131lar\u0131na vak\u0131f olduklar\u0131 halde hi\u00e7bir tedbir almayan emniyet ve jandarma birimlerine de sorumluluk y\u00fcklenmemi\u015f oluyor. Yine karara g\u00f6re, \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn hedef kitlesi de yok. Hrant Dink \u2018T\u00fcrkl\u00fc\u011fe hakaret edince\u2019, Yasin Hayal, Dink\u2019i \u2018cezaland\u0131rmaya\u2019 karar verir. \u00d6rg\u00fct\u00fc de bu ama\u00e7la kurar. \u00c7etin, Hrant Dink\u2019in \u2018T\u00fcrkl\u00fc\u011fe hakaret\u2019ten mahk\u00fbmiyetini oy birli\u011fiyle onayan dairenin de Yarg\u0131tay 9. Ceza Dairesi oldu\u011funu hat\u0131rlatt\u0131.<\/span><\/p>\n Avukat \u00c7etin\u2019e g\u00f6re Yarg\u0131tay\u2019\u0131n\u00a0 karar\u0131, Dink cinayetini planlayan g\u00fcc\u00fcn kurgulad\u0131\u011f\u0131 senaryoya uygun. Senaryoya g\u00f6re, \u2018Her t\u00fcrden psikolojik harek\u00e2t planlar\u0131yla Hrant Dink, toplumda nefret nesnesi haline getirilecek, sonra da \u2018kafas\u0131 bozulan\u2019 bir k\u0131s\u0131m milliyet\u00e7i gen\u00e7ler taraf\u0131ndan \u2018cezaland\u0131r\u0131lacakt\u0131r.\u2019 Cinayeti planlayan ve ad\u0131m ad\u0131m ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftiren \u00f6rg\u00fct ve \u00fcyeleri korunacak, deliller yok edilecektir. \u00c7etin, \u201cSenaryo, ger\u00e7e\u011fe ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fundan Yarg\u0131tay 9. Ceza Dairesi, ba\u015f\u0131nda planlanan senaryoya dayand\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131 karar\u0131nda do\u011fal olarak \u00e7eli\u015fkiye d\u00fc\u015fmekten kurtulamam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u201d dedi.<\/span><\/p>\n Avukat \u00c7etin, kararda Erhan Tuncel ile ilgili bir ifadeye dikkat \u00e7ekiyor: \u201cErhan Tuncel\u2019in \u00f6rg\u00fcte dahil oldu\u011fu tarihin, onun yard\u0131mc\u0131 istihbarat elemanl\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131 23.11.2006 tarihinden k\u0131sa bir s\u00fcre \u00f6ncesine rastlad\u0131\u011f\u0131 yaz\u0131lm\u0131\u015f. Bu \u015fekilde, Erhan Tuncel\u2019in yard\u0131mc\u0131 istihbarat g\u00f6revinden at\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n nedeni, bu \u00f6rg\u00fcte dahil oldu\u011fu i\u00e7inmi\u015f gibi bir alg\u0131 yarat\u0131lmaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015f. Emniyet g\u00f6revlilerini koruma ama\u00e7l\u0131 bu ifade, esasen onlara \u00e7ok daha a\u011f\u0131r bir sorumluluk y\u00fckl\u00fcyor: Yard\u0131mc\u0131 istihbarat eleman\u0131n\u0131z bir cinayet \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne kat\u0131lm\u0131\u015f ise bu \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc daha fazla\u00a0 ciddiye alman\u0131z gerekmez mi?\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n Erhan Tuncel muammas\u0131<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n Fethiye \u00c7etin kararda yer alan bir ba\u015fka \u00e7eli\u015fkiye daha dikkat \u00e7ekiyor: \u201cKararda, Yasin Hayal\u2019in, Erhan Tuncel\u2019in de kat\u0131l\u0131m\u0131 ile siyasi saiklerle su\u00e7 i\u015flemek i\u00e7in olu\u015fturdu\u011fu ve 24.10.2004 tarihinde mevcut oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lan te\u015fekk\u00fcl\u201d denilerek bu defa, Erhan Tuncel\u2019in 24.10.2004 tarihinden itibaren, yani Tuncel ve Hayal\u2019in ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirdikleri Mc Donalds sald\u0131r\u0131s\u0131ndan itibaren \u00f6rg\u00fctte var oldu\u011fu yaz\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Erhan Tuncel\u2019in \u00f6rg\u00fcte giri\u015f tarihi nedir? 2004 m\u00fc, 2006 m\u0131? \u00dcstelik e\u011fer 2004\u2019se, bu durumda, Tuncel sald\u0131r\u0131dan bir ay sonra, 17.11.2004 tarihi itibariyle Emniyet istihbarat hizmetlerine yard\u0131mc\u0131 istihbarat eleman\u0131 olarak al\u0131nm\u0131\u015f oluyor. Burada bir gariplik yok mu!\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n Yine kararda, cinayet saikini a\u00e7\u0131klamak i\u00e7in dosya i\u00e7indeki y\u00fczlerce kan\u0131ttan, y\u00fczlerce ifadeden ve belgeden sadece biri se\u00e7ilmi\u015f: \u201c19.01.2007 tarihinde maktul\u00fcn \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 gazetenin \u00f6n\u00fcne gelen Og\u00fcn Samast\u2019\u0131n, durumu san\u0131k Yasin Hayal\u2019e ayn\u0131 \u015fekilde telefonla bildirdi\u011fi, bir s\u00fcre sonra tekrar arayarak \u2018s\u0131k\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve i\u00e7eriye girip birka\u00e7 gazeteci vurabilece\u011fini\u201d s\u00f6yledi\u011fi; san\u0131k Yasin Hayal\u2019in maktul\u00fcn \u00f6ld\u00fcr\u00fclmesinden hemen \u00f6nce Og\u00fcn Samast\u2019a \u201cbizim i\u015fimiz Hrant Dink\u2019le\u201d demek suretiyle ortaya koydu\u011fu saik ve \u00f6rg\u00fctsel yakla\u015f\u0131m ile\u2026\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n \u00c7etin\u2019e g\u00f6re, y\u00fczlerce c\u00fcmlenin aras\u0131ndan bu c\u00fcmlenin se\u00e7ilmi\u015f olmas\u0131, \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn sadece Hrant Dink\u2019i \u2018cezaland\u0131rmak\u2019 amac\u0131yla hareket etti\u011fi kurgusunu kan\u0131tlamak i\u00e7in. Oysa, Og\u00fcn Samast, duru\u015fmada bunun aksi y\u00f6nde \u00e7ok say\u0131da ifadede bulunmu\u015ftur.\u00a0 \u00c7ok say\u0131da farkl\u0131 belgeye, ifadeye ra\u011fmen sadece bu c\u00fcmlenin se\u00e7ilmesi son derece ilgin\u00e7tir.<\/span><\/p>\n Avukat \u00c7etin, Yarg\u0131tay 9. Ceza Dairesi\u2019nin ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 bu karar\u0131n Dink cinayetini planlayan iradenin kurgulad\u0131\u011f\u0131 bi\u00e7imde noktaland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirtiyor: “Cinayet \u00f6ncesi haz\u0131rl\u0131k safhas\u0131 ile kamu g\u00f6revlilerinin olaya dahli ve sonras\u0131nda delillerin ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 ile bir b\u00fct\u00fcn olan cinayet s\u00fcreci\u00a0 bu kararla g\u00f6rmezden gelinmi\u015f, s\u00fcre\u00e7 par\u00e7alanarak, ba\u011flant\u0131lar yok say\u0131larak adalete eri\u015fim engellenmi\u015f ve maddi hakikatin ortaya \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6n\u00fc kesilmi\u015ftir.”<\/span><\/p>\n Fethiye \u00c7etin\u2019e g\u00f6re bu sonucu de\u011fi\u015ftirecek bir tek olanak kald\u0131; o da \u0130stanbul Cumhuriyet Savc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131\u2019nca alt\u0131 y\u0131ld\u0131r s\u00fcrd\u00fcr\u00fclen ama bir t\u00fcrl\u00fc sonu\u00e7land\u0131r\u0131lmayan soru\u015fturma dosyas\u0131.<\/span><\/p>\n Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k g\u00f6revi ihmal etti<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n Dink cinayetinin ard\u0131ndan Trabzon\u2019da \u0130l Jandarma Komutanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6revlileri hakk\u0131nda a\u00e7\u0131lan ve y\u0131lan hikayesine d\u00f6nen \u2018g\u00f6revi ihmal\u2019 davas\u0131nda Dink ailesi avukatlar\u0131n\u0131n temyiz dilek\u00e7esiyle ilgili olarak Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131\u2019n\u0131n kaleme ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 tebli\u011fname ortaya \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n tebli\u011fnamesi, avukatlar\u0131n temyiz dilek\u00e7esinde yer alan taleplerinin pek \u00e7o\u011funu reddediyor. \u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n Trabzon 2. Sulh Ceza Mahkemesi\u2019nden \u00f6nce sadece Okan \u015eim\u015fek ile Veysel \u015eahin hakk\u0131nda a\u00e7\u0131lan g\u00f6reve ihmal davas\u0131nda zaman i\u00e7inde Albay Ali \u00d6z, Y\u00fczba\u015f\u0131 Metin Y\u0131ld\u0131z, Ba\u015f\u00e7avu\u015f Gazi G\u00fcnay, Uzman \u00c7avu\u015f \u00d6nder Araz, Ba\u015f\u00e7avu\u015f H\u00fcseyin Y\u0131lmaz, Uzman \u00c7avu\u015f Hac\u0131 \u00d6mer \u00dcnal\u0131r hakk\u0131nda da \u2018g\u00f6revi ihmal\u2019 su\u00e7lamas\u0131 ile dava a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131. Uzun s\u00fcre Trabzon 2. Sulh Ceza Mahkemesi ile Trabzon A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi aras\u0131nda gidip gelen davay\u0131 sonu\u00e7 olarak Trabzon 2. Sulh Ceza Mahkemesi y\u00fcr\u00fctmek zorunda kald\u0131 ve \u00a0g\u00f6revlerini ihmal ettikleri gerek\u00e7esi ile Ali \u00d6z ve Metin Y\u0131ld\u0131z\u2019a 6 ay, Veysel \u015eahin, Okan \u015eim\u015fek, H\u00fcseyin Y\u0131lmaz ve Hac\u0131 \u00d6mer \u00dcnal\u0131r\u2019a 42 ay hapis cezas\u0131, Gazi G\u00fcnay ile \u00d6nder Araz\u2019a ise beraat karar\u0131 verdi.<\/span><\/p>\n Dink ailesi avukatlar\u0131, gerek\u00e7eli temyiz dilek\u00e7esinde dava s\u00fcreciyle ilgili g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f ve taleplerin ifade etmi\u015fti. Yarg\u0131tay Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 ise tebli\u011fnamesinde san\u0131klar hakk\u0131nda kurulan \u201cg\u00f6revi ihmal sureti ile g\u00f6revi k\u00f6t\u00fcye kullanma\u201c su\u00e7una y\u00f6nelik h\u00fckm\u00fc yerinde buldu, ancak san\u0131klar Ali \u00d6z, Metin Y\u0131ld\u0131z, Gazi G\u00fcnay, Okan \u015eim\u015fek, Veysel \u015eahin ile \u00d6nder Araz\u2019\u0131n, 2006 y\u0131l\u0131 Temmuz ay\u0131nda elde ettikleri cinayete dair bilgileri cinayetten bir g\u00fcn sonra, yani 20 Ocak 2007\u2019de elde etmi\u015f gibi yazm\u0131\u015f olmalar\u0131 eyleminin resmi evrakta sahtecilik su\u00e7unu olu\u015fturdu\u011funu, bu su\u00e7un delillerinin takdir yetkisinin ise A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi\u2019nin g\u00f6rev alan\u0131na girdi\u011fi nedeni ile karar\u0131n bozulmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini belirtiyor.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n Temyiz dilek\u00e7esinde belirtilen pek \u00e7ok hususun g\u00f6zard\u0131 edildi\u011fi tebli\u011fnamede, yaln\u0131zca resmi evrakta sahtecilik su\u00e7u nedeni ile bozma talebinde bulunuluyor. \u00d6te yandan, yine ayn\u0131 tebli\u011fnamede Trabzon Jandarma Komutanl\u0131\u011f\u0131\u2019na ait istihbarat ar\u015fivlerinin cinayetten sonra Trabzon \u0130l Jandarma Komutanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u0130stihbarat \u015eube M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc Personeli taraf\u0131ndan delilleri karartacak \u015fekilde bir b\u00fct\u00fcn olarak yeniden d\u00fczenlenmi\u015f oldu\u011fundan bahsedilmiyor. Tebli\u011fnamede s\u00f6z edilmeyen bir di\u011fer konu da, cinayetle ilgili olarak Giresun Jandarma B\u00f6lge Komutanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve Jandarma Genel Komutanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 ar\u015fivlerinde ilgili d\u00f6neme ait belgelerin ve dijital kay\u0131tlar\u0131n de\u011fi\u015ftirilip de\u011fi\u015ftirilmedi\u011finin incelenmesinin gereklili\u011fi. <\/span><\/p>\n http:\/\/www.agos.com.tr\/yargitay-9-dairesi-senaryoya-son-noktayi-koydu-5129.html<\/span><\/i><\/b><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Normal 0 false false false EN-US X-NONE X-NONE \/* Style Definitions *\/ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:”Table Normal”; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-qformat:yes; mso-style-parent:””; mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; mso-para-margin-top:0in; mso-para-margin-right:0in; mso-para-margin-bottom:10.0pt; mso-para-margin-left:0in; line-height:115%; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:11.0pt; font-family:”Calibri”,”sans-serif”; mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri; mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-fareast-font-family:”Times New Roman”; mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast; mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri; mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;} Yarg\u0131tay 9. Ceza Dairesi\u2019nin Dink cinayeti davas\u0131yla ilgili verdi\u011fi karar\u0131n ayr\u0131nt\u0131lar\u0131 ortaya \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131k\u00e7a, Hrant […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[14],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-23682","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-haberler"],"yoast_head":"\n