![\"\"](\"https:\/\/akunq.net\/tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/Anayasa-Mahkemesi-360x204.jpg\")
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
Anayasa Mahkemesi Bal\u0131kl\u0131 Rum Hastanesi Vakf\u0131\u2019nda uzun s\u00fcredir se\u00e7im yap\u0131lam\u0131yor olu\u015fu ile ilgili Rum toplumundan isimlerin ba\u015fvurmas\u0131 \u00fczerine \u201c\u00d6rg\u00fctlenme \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ihlal edilmi\u015ftir\u201d karar\u0131 verdi.<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n Rum toplumundan be\u015f ki\u015fi 2014 y\u0131l\u0131ndan Bak\u0131rk\u00f6y Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesine \u00a0ba\u015fvurarak 1991 y\u0131l\u0131ndan bu yana hastane vakf\u0131 i\u00e7in se\u00e7ilme yap\u0131lamda\u011f\u0131n\u0131 bildirdi. Ba\u015fvurucular 2004 ve 2008 y\u0131l\u0131nda vakf\u0131n y\u00f6netim kurulu se\u00e7imi yapmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini belirttiler. Ancak ba\u015fvurudan sonu\u00e7 al\u0131namay\u0131nca ba\u015fvucular Anayasa Mahkemesi’ni gettiler.<\/p>\n Bilindi\u011fi Vak\u0131flar Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc yakla\u015f\u0131k 10 y\u0131l \u00f6nce az\u0131nl\u0131k vak\u0131flar\u0131n\u0131n se\u00e7im yapmas\u0131na olanak veren y\u00f6netmeli\u011fi iptal etmi\u015f, yeni y\u00f6netmelik uzun s\u00fcre yay\u0131nlanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in vak\u0131flar se\u00e7im yapamam\u0131\u015ft\u0131.<\/p>\n 2022 y\u0131l\u0131nda y\u00f6netmelik \u00a0yay\u0131nland\u0131 ancak Az\u0131nl\u0131k Vak\u0131flar\u0131 Hastaneleri se\u00e7imleri i\u00e7in ayr\u0131 bir y\u00f6netmeli\u011fin 2023 y\u0131l\u0131nda yay\u0131nlanaca\u011f\u0131 belirtildi. Ancak bu y\u00f6netmelik halen yay\u0131nlanm\u0131\u015f de\u011fil.<\/p>\n Ba\u015fvuruyu inceleyen Anayasa Mahkemesi 19 Aral\u0131k 2023’te bir karar verdi.<\/p>\n Mahkemenin karar\u0131n\u0131n sonu\u00e7 b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fc \u015f\u00f6yle:<\/p>\n \u201cNiteli\u011fi itibar\u0131yla ba\u015fvuruda tespit edilen hak ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131nda hukuki yarar bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna var\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Yap\u0131lan incelemede 18\/6\/2022 tarihli ve 31870 say\u0131l\u0131 Resm\u00ee Gazete\u2019de Cemaat Vak\u0131flar\u0131 Se\u00e7im Y\u00f6netmeli\u011fi’nin yay\u0131mland\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. O h\u00e2lde somut ba\u015fvuruda ihlale neden olan y\u00f6netmelik bo\u015flu\u011funun 2022 tarihli Y\u00f6netmelik h\u00fck\u00fcmleri \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde giderilebilece\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu bak\u0131mdan ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n mensubu olduklar\u0131 cemaat vakf\u0131n\u0131n se\u00e7imlerinin yap\u0131lmas\u0131 ve ba\u015fvuruda tespit edilen ihlallerin giderilmesi i\u00e7in Vak\u0131flar Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne bildirimde bulunulmas\u0131 gerekir.<\/p>\n \u00d6te yandan somut olay ba\u011flam\u0131nda ihlalin tespit edilmesinin ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131 zararlar\u0131n giderilmesi bak\u0131m\u0131ndan yetersiz kalaca\u011f\u0131 de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015ftir. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla ihlalin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131labilmesi i\u00e7in \u00f6rg\u00fctlenme \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn ihlali nedeniyle manevi zararlar\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda ba\u015fvuruculara talepleriyle ba\u011fl\u0131 kal\u0131narak net 10.000 TL manevi tazminat\u0131n m\u00fc\u015ftereken \u00f6denmesine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n H\u00dcK\u00dcM B. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 33. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan \u00f6rg\u00fctlenme \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn \u0130HLAL ED\u0130LD\u0130\u011e\u0130NE,<\/p>\n C. \u0130dareden kaynakl\u0131 sorunun \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcm\u00fc i\u00e7in Vak\u0131flar Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne B\u0130LD\u0130R\u0130MDE BULUNULMASINA,<\/p>\n Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE 19\/12\/2023 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.”<\/p>\n Ba\u015fvurucular \u015f\u00f6yle: Efthymia Meentzlou, Evdoksia Galanopulo, Katina Evdokiya Veriopolos, Keti Vu\u00e7as, Maria Filimon. Ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n avukatl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ise Cem Sofuo\u011flu yapt\u0131.<\/p>\n Mahkeme\u00a0 karar\u0131nda \u015fu ifadelere yer verdi:<\/p>\n “A\u0130HM, \u00f6rg\u00fctlenme \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn ulusal ve etnik az\u0131nl\u0131klar da d\u00e2hil olmak \u00fczere az\u0131nl\u0131klara mensup ki\u015filer i\u00e7in \u00f6zellikle \u00f6nemli oldu\u011funu, Avrupa Konseyi \u00c7er\u00e7eve S\u00f6zle\u015fmesi’nin giri\u015f b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcnde belirtildi\u011fi \u00fczere “\u00e7o\u011fulcu ve ger\u00e7ekten demokratik bir toplumun, ulusal bir az\u0131nl\u0131\u011fa mensup her bir ki\u015finin etnik, k\u00fclt\u00fcrel, dilsel ve dini kimli\u011fine sayg\u0131 g\u00f6stermekle kalmay\u0131p, ayn\u0131 zamanda bu kimli\u011fi ifade etmelerini, korumalar\u0131n\u0131 ve geli\u015ftirmelerini sa\u011flayacak uygun ko\u015fullar\u0131 yaratmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini” kabul etmektedir. A\u0130HM kimli\u011fini ifade etmek ve geli\u015ftirmek i\u00e7in bir \u00f6rg\u00fct kurman\u0131n bir az\u0131nl\u0131\u011f\u0131n haklar\u0131n\u0131 korumas\u0131na ve geli\u015ftirmesine yard\u0131mc\u0131 olabilece\u011fini ifade eder (Gorzelik ve di\u011ferleri\/Polonya, \u00a7\u00a7 92, 93).<\/em><\/p>\n A\u0130HM \u00f6rg\u00fctlenme \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne ger\u00e7ek ve etkili bir \u015fekilde sayg\u0131 g\u00f6sterilmesinin devletin sadece m\u00fcdahale etmeme y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne indirgenemeyece\u011fini, salt negatif bir anlay\u0131\u015f\u0131n ne 11. maddenin ne de genel olarak Avrupa \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 S\u00f6zle\u015fmesi’nin amac\u0131yla uyumlu olaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ifade etmi\u015ftir. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla bu \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fcklerin etkili bir \u015fekilde kullan\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na almak i\u00e7in pozitif y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fckler s\u00f6z konusu olabilir”<\/em><\/p>\n Kararda \u015fu ifadeler dikkat \u00e7ekti:<\/p>\n “Ba\u015fvuru konusu olay 5737 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un i\u015faret etti\u011fi \u015fekilde cemaat vak\u0131flar\u0131n\u0131n se\u00e7im usullerinin y\u00f6netmelikle belirlenmesi h\u00fckm\u00fcne istinaden \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lan y\u00f6netmeli\u011fin iptal edilmesi etraf\u0131nda \u015fekillenmi\u015ftir. Bunun sonucunda an\u0131lan se\u00e7im usullerini d\u00fczenleyen bir y\u00f6netmelik bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle uzun y\u0131llar boyunca se\u00e7im yap\u0131lmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. \u0130lgili Y\u00f6netmelik iptal edildikten sonra, yeni bir Y\u00f6netmelik \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmamas\u0131n\u0131n, bu s\u00fcre zarf\u0131nda idarenin hareketsiz kalmas\u0131n\u0131n temel hakk\u0131n kullan\u0131m\u0131n\u0131 engelleyici nitelikte bir mevzuat bo\u015flu\u011fu yaratt\u0131\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r. Buna ra\u011fmen kanun koyucunun i\u015faret etti\u011fi \u015fekilde idare s\u00f6z konusu alan\u0131 d\u00fczenlememi\u015f ve 19\/1\/2013 tarihinden itibaren cemaat vak\u0131flar\u0131n\u0131n se\u00e7im usullerinde uygulanacak kurallar y\u00f6n\u00fcnden bir mevzuat bo\u015flu\u011fu olu\u015fmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n Bunun \u00fczerine ba\u015fvurucular, a\u00e7t\u0131klar\u0131 davada ilgili bo\u015flu\u011fun 4721 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 1. maddesi kapsam\u0131nda h\u00e2kim taraf\u0131ndan doldurulmas\u0131n\u0131 talep etmi\u015f ancak Mahkeme 5737 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun ve bu Kanun’un cemaat vak\u0131flar\u0131n\u0131n se\u00e7imlerinin d\u00fczenlenmesinin y\u00f6netmelik ile yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn mevcut olmas\u0131 nedeniyle hukuksal bir bo\u015flu\u011fun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 de\u011ferlendirerek davay\u0131 reddetmi\u015ftir. Bir ba\u015fka deyi\u015fle yarg\u0131laman\u0131n sonunda davan\u0131n esas\u0131 hakk\u0131nda bir karar vermemi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucular t\u00fcm bu s\u00fcre boyunca cemaat vakf\u0131 se\u00e7imlerinin yapt\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flayamam\u0131\u015f; \u00f6zetle Vakf\u0131n do\u011fal \u00fcyeleri olmalar\u0131na ra\u011fmen Vakf\u0131n y\u00f6netimi ile ilgili oy kullanamam\u0131\u015f, se\u00e7imlerde s\u00f6z sahibi olamam\u0131\u015f, Vak\u0131f y\u00f6netimini denetleyememi\u015f ve sonu\u00e7 olarak \u00f6rg\u00fctlenme \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fcklerinden yararlanamam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla yukar\u0131da anlat\u0131lanlar \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde olaylar bir b\u00fct\u00fcn olarak de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde devletin \u00fczerine d\u00fc\u015fen \u015fekilde y\u00f6netmelik d\u00fczenlemesi yapmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu durum ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n cemaat vakf\u0131 y\u00f6netim kurulu se\u00e7imleri yap\u0131lmamas\u0131 ile ilgili \u015fik\u00e2yetinin uzunca bir s\u00fcre \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcms\u00fcz b\u0131rak\u0131larak \u00f6rg\u00fctlenme \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn getirdi\u011fi haklara eri\u015fimlerini imk\u00e2ns\u0131z k\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Netice olarak devletin ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n s\u00f6z\u00fc edilen Vak\u0131flarda kendileri ve Vakf\u0131n \u00fcyeleri ad\u0131na \u00f6rg\u00fctl\u00fc bir bi\u00e7imde hareket etme hakk\u0131ndan etkin bir \u015fekilde yararlanmalar\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flamak konusundaki pozitif y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fcklerini yerine getirmedi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle Anayasa’n\u0131n 33. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan \u00f6rg\u00fctlenme \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn ihlal edildi\u011fine karar verilmesi gerekir.”<\/p>\n https:\/\/www.agos.com.tr\/tr\/yazi\/30324\/anayasa-mahkemesi-nden-azinlik-vakiflari-hastaneleri-secimleri-icin-kritik-karar\u00a0<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Anayasa Mahkemesi Bal\u0131kl\u0131 Rum Hastanesi Vakf\u0131\u2019nda uzun s\u00fcredir se\u00e7im yap\u0131lam\u0131yor olu\u015fu ile ilgili Rum toplumundan isimlerin ba\u015fvurmas\u0131 \u00fczerine \u201c\u00d6rg\u00fctlenme \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ihlal edilmi\u015ftir\u201d karar\u0131 verdi. Rum toplumundan be\u015f ki\u015fi 2014 y\u0131l\u0131ndan Bak\u0131rk\u00f6y Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesine \u00a0ba\u015fvurarak 1991 y\u0131l\u0131ndan bu yana hastane vakf\u0131 i\u00e7in se\u00e7ilme yap\u0131lamda\u011f\u0131n\u0131 bildirdi. Ba\u015fvurucular 2004 ve 2008 y\u0131l\u0131nda vakf\u0131n y\u00f6netim kurulu se\u00e7imi yapmas\u0131 […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":79542,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1,53],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-79541","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-haberler","category-turkiyede-azinliklar"],"yoast_head":"\n
\nA. \u00d6rg\u00fctlenme \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n KABUL ED\u0130LEB\u0130L\u0130R OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n